Compositions and Methods for Improved Lyme Disease Diagnosis
This technology hinges on a unique approach that would detect whether a patient has a presently active B. burgdorferi infection. A fully developed assay based on these innovations would exploit the detection of the B. burgdorferi BbHtrA protease and/or its unique cleavage products to carry out a timely diagnosis of infection. While other direct detection methods, such as culturing, PCR and antigen capture, are often used in research laboratory settings, they have not demonstrated consistent efficacy as clinical diagnostic tools in the first few weeks following tick bite exposure. Further, despite the lack of a rapid and efficient readout for the aforementioned antibody-based Lyme disease diagnostics, there are currently no FDA-approved comparable alternatives. This technology provides a unique opportunity for rapid and accurate identification of B. burgdorferi infection, as well as distinguishing current bacterium exposure from prior exposure, thereby providing critical information to better inform treatment strategy and improve patient outcomes.
- Lyme disease/B. burgdorferi diagnostics
- Zoonotic/tick-borne disease surveillance
- Informing clinician strategies and improving patient outcomes
- Reducing diagnosis time for patients concerned about tick bites
- Present Lyme disease diagnostics cannot distinguish between current bacterium infections and prior exposures; this technology will provide such distinctions.
- Predominant antibody-based diagnostics currently available require weeks before efficacy and may require re-testing at later dates to avoid false negatives; this technology directly addresses this problem.
- Other alternative direct detection methods (e.g., PCR, culturing) have shown limited efficacy as clinical diagnostics.